Tuesday, June 8, 2010

The Treehouse Meeting - a quick update

Though I haven't had time to fully process all that was said at last night's Regent Square Civic Association meeting, I want to share my initial thoughts because I know everyone is curious.

Overall, I think the meeting went very well. I was very nervous going into it, having no idea what people might say. The Parks Conservancy did a great job of explaining it's role in the parks and presenting information about Kate and Peter's project. The meeting was well attended and it seemed as if everyone who wanted to was able to ask questions or share their comments.

I felt that, generally, everyone who spoke was honest and respectful. People spoke from their hearts and I did my absolute best to listen and hear everything that was said. There was a lot of support as well as opposition for placing the treehouse in Turtle Park, though I use the term opposition lightly because it did seem that most residents were not necessarily opposed to the treehouse, but rather concerned with what impact this location might have on their neighborhood.

In my opinion, the overwhelming concerns revolved around traffic and parking. I think before we can decide the most appropriate location for the treehouse, we need to examine the impact this project will have on traffic and parking and if anything can be done to rectify the situation. Who knows, maybe by addressing these issues as part of the development of the treehouse we could actually make changes that improve traffic and parking for this community? I think it's possible it could be a win-win situation, and everyone could benefit. But that remains to be seen and certainly, at this point no decisions have been made.

It also seemed clear that many of the traffic issues are in no way related to the treehouse and are city issues that need to be dealt with regardless of the location of this project. As one man said toward the close of the meeting, "not building this treehouse will not fix these problems". It's true, these issues are far bigger than the treehouse.

I promise that as I have time to digest the information shared at the meeting and talk with the other parties involved I will update you on the specifics and what the next steps will be. For now, I just want to thank everyone who was there last night. Thank you for being there to support me, to support this project and to speak out for a neighborhood that you love. I think only good things will come from this and I'm so glad everyone had an opportunity to say what they needed to say.

11 comments:

  1. Glad to hear that it went well. Hang in there, you will make this a reality! -Jenn O.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think you put it very well. Not building the treehouse will do nothing to alleviate Braddock Ave traffic. It was an honor to be there in support.

    ReplyDelete
  3. We love you!

    -ashley

    ReplyDelete
  4. So glad to hear it went well! Saw your interview on TV and you were very well spoken - I admire your strength at staying positive, keep it up!!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Here's another blogger's take on the meeting:

    http://pghcomet.blogspot.com/2010/06/treehouse-issue-draws-large-mixed.html

    ReplyDelete
  6. Mrs. "S"June 8, 2010 at 2:13 PM

    I agree, it went better than anticipated and the traffic issue will be there with or without the treehouse. I also think the meeting cleared up some misconceptions that the neighborhood had about how the money was donated and the treehouse being part of ECS. Will always be there for you but may "shun" photographers in the future.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yeah - was quite a scene last night - like you said, lots of support - and still some opposition. I do think some things were cleared up - like the treehouse being part of ECS, etc. - which, I think, had some neighbors concerned because of some past issues with neighborhood playgrounds being taken over by neighboring schools and the kids there... apparently. Anyway - hope it is all moving forward and / or passed into productive discussion now that the meeting is done.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I think the photo of Mrs. S in the Post Gazette is actually quite beautiful, very touching and heartbreaking. I think it tells the tale of both love and support and disbelief, frustration, and sadness.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Quite the discussion going on @ the blog. I can't imagine why anyone would be opposed to having the tree house. I check your blog everyday for updates. Keep on keeping on. You inspire me!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Glad to hear it went well!

    And happy birthday to Kate today!

    ReplyDelete
  11. So glad there is movement, even if it doesn't feel like much. I hadn't heard that the name of the park was Turtle Park - I think it's a sign. The treehouse will be built and it will be wonderful!

    ReplyDelete